1. Corel Videostudio Ultimate 2018 Requirements

With its latest version of VideoStudio Pro, Corel is aiming to crack the Web video production nut. VideoStudio Pro X5 ($80 as of April 30, 2012) is a video-editing application capable of handling everything from start to finish, supplying all that you need to produce videos that you can host, and that play in any HTML 5-compliant browser. But you'll need a computer with one of the latest CPUs to produce cutting-edge video.HTML 5-What's Hot for VideoTo make your videos play on a Web page-as well as on smartphones and tablets-you can upload them to YouTube and use its embed code, or you can host them on your own server. All of the major desktop Internet browsers (Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Apple Safari, Opera, and Microsoft Internet Explorer) are compatible with Adobe Flash video content, but significantly Safari on the iPhone and iPad is not. Meanwhile, all of the latest browser versions recognize HTML 5 code, but they don't all play. For example, Chrome and the standard Android browser support and Google's (and YouTube's) own, while Internet Explorer and Safari support only the video format.

Firefox and Opera support Ogg Theora and WebM. Due to, no single video format enjoys support in all browsers, so if you want to accommodate all of your website visitors, you must output video in multiple formats and use multiple HTML 5 source tags to instruct browsers to look for a format that they can play.In light of that, VideoStudio Pro X5's new HTML 5 output feature has the potential to be a tremendous timesaver-not only will it output in multiple formats, but it will also produce the HTML 5 code to support them. The application comes with one HTML 5 template and provides easy access to a few additional ones (all of them especially cheesy) via download; you can drop video clips and still images into the template, and modify the titles with your own text.

Mar 13, 2019 - Cbxtewalqxurysf3jzetlw corel balloon 90 x 90. VideoStudio Pro X3, however, can only use 2Gb of RAM no matter which Operating System you use. VideoStudio Pro X3 has been optimised to take advantage of Nvidia CUDA™. ATI: http://support.amd.com/us/Pages/AMDSupportHub.aspx. Best video editing software for the money. My copy of Corel VideoStudio Ultimate X9 has allowed me to edit my video footage, add effects and share it with friends and family without hours of reading or stress. The application is fairly intuitive and the more you play with it the more features you will discover - even without looking at the manual. This article lists the supported input and output format in Corel VideoStudio Pro X5. Input Formats Supported Video: AVI.

If the project contains a menu system (similar to that of a DVD or Blu-ray Disc), chapter points in the timeline will serve as links that take viewers to designated points in the composition. VideoStudio Pro X5 provides few output formatting options, other than standard- or high-definition; you can't adjust the quality settings at all.Corel says that you can open the resulting HTML 5 file in any Web-authoring application, and that's true-but it's not like you're getting a chunk of YouTube embed code that you can simply drop into an existing Web page. Instead, VideoStudio Pro X5 produces a mini website with lengthy CSS files, so if you want to customize the look or add elements, you'll either have to modify the VideoStudio Pro X5-generated files to suit your needs or try to dig out pieces of the source code in those files and then copy the code to your existing pages.Acceleration for SomeFor HTML 5 output, VideoStudio Pro X5 produces both H.264 and WebM video files so that it can accommodate all browsers; producing two files, however, means additional rendering time. Furthermore, as of now, you must rely on software rendering to produce WebM files, because no hardware acceleration yet exists. As a result, on my system, a four-year-old dual-Xeon workstation with 8GB of RAM, a high-end graphics card, a RAID setup, and Windows 7 64-bit, VideoStudio Pro X5 was very slow to produce HTML 5 packages.

It required 42 minutes to produce these files for a 56-second video; it took 3.5 hours to process a 20-minute video.After the HTML 5 files were complete, I was able to open them and play the videos they contained locally within Firefox 10, Chrome 17, Safari 5, and Internet Explorer 10. Older browsers prompted 'Browser is not supported' messages. But when I loaded the files onto my Web server, the videos wouldn't play most of the time; one played for a few seconds and then refused to go further.Despite the lethargic performance on my system, Corel says that VideoStudio Pro X5 has numerous improvements designed to take advantage of the latest Intel Sandy Bridge and AMD Fusion CPUs, and that it also has some GPU acceleration, and thus VideoStudio Pro X5 runs 'close to 10 times faster than VideoStudio Pro X4.' (A Corel rep stressed, however, that that claim does not apply to rendering times.) I could not test the 10x claim with my system, because VideoStudio Pro X5 has no acceleration improvements for older CPUs (and it is still a 32-bit application, by the way).In contrast, the GPU acceleration technology Adobe uses in its requires your system to have one of a small number of pricey graphics cards, and that version doesn't have CPU acceleration. VideoStudio Pro X5 still has its proxy mode, too, whereby you can work in a low-resolution mode to improve editing performance and then instruct the application to output using the high-resolution source files.The application can now accommodate up to 20 'overlay' tracks, which means that, especially in HTML 5 layouts, the tracks are designed more for graphical elements rather than additional video tracks. You can, however, import layered images; when you drag one into the timeline, the layers will populate different timelines automatically.

It doesn't do the same for layered files in other companies' formats (but I doubt that Adobe will ever accommodate PaintShop Pro files, either, and it does support doing so for layered Photoshop files).You can use VideoStudio Pro X5's new screen-capture utility to create videos of your screen while you work in any displayed application. If you own a microphone, you can add voice-overs while you capture. A small interface window appears when you choose the screen-capture command; and once you click a button, it counts down from three, at which point the window disappears and your screen capture begins. When you're done, you can import the captured footage into a timeline and add the usual video elements-effects, titles, and overlays-though you'll still have to deal with VideoStudio's clumsy keyframing (to adjust the effects' intensity over time).Time for a New PC?Credit Corel for pursuing cutting-edge features such as the CPU optimizations and HTML 5 output; I haven't yet seen those in its competitors' products. But if you don't own the most cutting-edge hardware, VideoStudio Pro X5 may leave you feeling a bit left out of the party, and the HTML 5 output feature seems like more of an exercise than a useful feature addition at this point, even if it isn't Corel's fault that the rendering times are so long.

Aside from those issues, VideoStudio Pro X5 is a pretty good video editor, though one that may lack the precise control that competitors offer.

Video Editing and Video Rendering used to be completely processor or CPU dependent tasks, but nowadays with modern video editing softwares taking advantage of the latest GPU technologies, the role of graphics card has become much greater in video editing / rendering. This means you cannot neglect the importance of a graphics card in this era when it comes with video editing, especially with top video editing softwares like Adobe Premiere Pro CC, Adobe After Effects CC or with other popular video editing softwares include Adobe Premiere Elements, Corel VideoStudio, Filmora, Pinnacle Studio.For HD or Full HD video editing a good budget is enough but for 4K video editing you do need a decent mid-range to high-end graphics card having minimum of or VRAM. Modern video editing softwares like Adobe Premiere Pro CC supports GPGPU (General-purpose computing on graphics processing units) that allows them to use graphics card for their various complex computational tasks along with CPU. This is known as GPU acceleration and it enables faster processing in video editing and video rendering. So, here in this post I am going to list down only the best graphics cards for 1080p and 4K video editing from both Nvidia and AMD. Nvidia or AMD GPU for Video Editing?Most of the popular video editing softwares like Adobe Premiere Pro support CUDA or OpenCL frameworks (or both) for GPU acceleration. Is Nvidia’s proprietary parallel computing platform and programming model for Nvidia graphics cards.

On the other hand, uses OpenCL (Open Computing Language) which is an open source parallel programming framework. Nvidia also supports OpenCL but it is not as good and efficient when it comes to OpenCL computations compared to AMD GPUs. So, if you are getting a graphics card for video editing purpose especially for softwares like Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects then Nvidia Graphics Cards will perform a bit better than the AMD ones. Well, the total memory bandwidth offered by GTX 1060 is 192 GB/s and for RX 580 it is 256 GB/s. This means RX 580 will perform a bit better in memory intensive tasks. However, GTX 1060 does perform better in Adobe Premiere Pro because of CUDA support, while in DaVinci Resolve RX 580 can lead ahead because of 8GB VRAM which is a bit faster too.

In general these softwares work better with Nvidia cards because of better CUDA optimization and driver support. Well, at the end of the day, you cannot go wrong with either of these cards but if i had to choose between them, then i would certainly prefer GTX 1060 (6GB) for video editing work. Excellent article.

I must say i am confused by the nature of video cards vs graphics cards. Im about to replace my old dying desktop computer and am stuck with a few questions – namely around the graphics/card – im a semi professional photography who also does videography currently only in HD (although mavic air can do 4K). The second option (i7 8700 with GTX 1060) offers the best performance for the money. Core i7 8700 is faster than Ryzen 5 2600, and GTX 1060 is a powerful mid-range card, which is enough for your video editing (up to 4K) and even 1080p/1440p gaming needs. GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 would be an overkill unless you are into high-end 1440p & 4K gaming. Also, Nvidia cards perform better in Adobe softwares such as Premiere, Lightroom etc.

Because of CUDA support. 16GB RAM is enough for now with 256GB SSD (for Windows OS) and 2TB HDD (for storage). Hope this helps! I’m looking for a good graphics card for my Plex box. I have several criteria for consideration1 – The graphics will be used to do hw acceleration for h.264/h.265 video. I have lots of friends on this box so if the hw is available the Plex uses it. My CPU is E5-2650L.2 – I use Staxrip.

Many video I have on the 10bit hdr side is ginormous. I run stax-rip to re-render some of these insane size down. (I resample most of my 10bit/hdr stuff at 12000 bit.same for my h.264 stuff to keep storage down.) So i need a card that can do this task fast.3 – Power. The server is on all the time. So low power is always good,The E5-2650L I have is burning 65W with 14 cores @ 1.7.

Corel Videostudio Ultimate 2018 Requirements

I’m currently running a 1050Ti. That is drawing 75w.Im curiuos if going to a 1660 will get me any benefits with staxrip. As i do dual pass on these 10bit hdr and getting about 1.051.36 fps during processing.My consideration factor is if i spend more power on a card how many more fps i will get how much faster wiil i get the re-rendering task done 🙂 is the 1050Ti my best bang for the buck or is there something better?

For video editing, yes they are an overkill to similarly priced GTX 10 series cards, especially for adobe premiere pro. Also, more RAM will help in 4K video editing. However, if you want to go the RTX route then there are some good options available too under $2500, but the thing is they lack HDD, and comes with SSD only, which can limit your storage capability.

ASUS ROG Strix Hero II Gaming Laptop (15.6” 144Hz IPS Type Full HD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, Intel Core i7-8750H, 16GB DDR4, 512GB PCIe Nvme SSD)2. Razer Blade 15 RTX (15.6″ 144Hz Full HD Thin Bezel – 8th Gen Intel Core i7-8750H 6 Core – NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 – 16GB RAM – 512GB SSD). Great article Akshat!I’ve been researching for the past 6 months or so. Finally, I bought a 10 core 9900X cpu, 2 SSD nvme 1tb each, 64Gb (16×4) gskill ripjaws Ram, and im Just torn by the graphic card.My work is mainly post production, high end photography as well as 4k videoeditng in Premiere and as soon as I finish this build I want to start using Davinci Resolve, and working with Raw footage more often, maybe even 6k, depending on the material this pc will let me handle.I really need to output 10 bit from the graphic card, I also bought a Benq sw3200 4k photovue monitor for the same reason, so i need this color accuracy cause its part of what i do. So ive been waiting for the quadro rtx 4000 to hit the market. But im kind of indecisive, cause i also want to game in this. So I almost hit the trigger with a 2080 ti.

But that would imply no 10 bit in photoshop or premiere. At least until i get a Blackmagic declink which means more money to invest, plus a second monitor.Any advice of the capabilities of the quadro rtx 4000 gaming capabilities (or non existence if so) at least decent frame rate at 1440p and 4k with low frame rate?Ii it the quadro equivalent to the 2070 geforce rtx?And how does this card handles 4k raw footage?Is it worth it?Or should I pull the trigger on a 2080 ti?Thanks! Hi There,This is a really nice discussion since I have been running around google to find article like this especially about video editing.I plan to build PC with ryzen 5 2600. And now I am confused to decide the graphic card.Please help me to convince my choicethere are 3 in my list1. MSI RX 570 Armor 8GB OC2. Galax GTX 1050TI 4GB DDR5 EXOC3.

Zotax GTX 1050TI 4GB DDR5 OCpleaseee help mee to find my way. Which one should I buy for better video Editing?.Video Editing.bit gaming. Very bit.Bestbudget. I am wondering if the configuration of the i5 6600k processor, the Gigabyte Radeon AORUS RX 570 256bit 4GB DDR5, 12gb ram, will be enough to work in DaVinci Resolve? I would produce clips in the duration of 5-10 min in full HD.

I would add more RAM later. It would be the last DaVinci 15.3.Now DaVinci is reporting the error “DaVinci Resolve could not find any OpenCL capable GPUs.

Would you like to review and update your DaVinci Resolve Hardware Configuration?” I currently have integrated Intel HD graphics from the i5 6600K processor.Thanks! Thanks for the update on video cards. I have PC that I build 5 years ago. Since that time I have ventured into producing training videos.

I use Premiere Pro-After Effects- Motion Graphic Templates.etc. I’d like to upgrade the video card if it makes sense on this 5 year old PC. My build has a i7-4770K @3.5Hz, 4 cores. 16 GB of Ramand a Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 card.

I do not do games but I would like to get faster rendering times and possibly start using 4K media.Which cards would give me a practical boost in performance?Thanks. Hi Akshat,I recently had to go overseas for an assignment and couldn’t (don’t want to) bring my PC with me for video editing. I’m in the market for a laptop that is powerful enough to edit the 4K 60 fps video I shoot. I’m looking at Cyberpower PC and see some options there. I will traveling home soon and need to pull the trigger fast because I won’t be there long so I need to order so it will get there before I have to return for work. I’m fortunate that my budget is not a problem, but I don’t want to get the most expensive machine if it doesn’t add any value. What would you recommend for me from their catalog?

You did a great job on this article! I am building a video editing PC and am going with a AMD Threadstripper 2950X and have been torn between graphics cards. I am editing 90% of the time on DaVinci Resolve with 4K files and some on Hitfilm Pro and Power Director. Before reading this article I thought I needed crazy spec’d cards, but now I am looking at the 1660ti and the RX 580. I have the budget to move up a little (i.e. AMD Radeon VII or RTX 2080), but am looking at the best bang for my buck. What is your advice?

Many thanks for this article! I am building a workstation for heavy video editing, color grading, after effects and use of general Adobe programmes (photoshop/illustrator etc.). My budget can accommodate Geforce rtx 2080 ti or alternatively a quadro rtx 4000 (unfortunately not higher for a quadro).I am not sure which of the two to choose, since, as I understand, Geforce rtx 2080 11gb ti will perform much better with heavy rendering, but the quadro rtx 4000 8gb offers 10-bit color depth, which is a plus (I don’t know if there are any other pluses for the quadro rtx 4000 other than this??).Would it be an option that I combine Geforce rtx 2080 ti and a cheap quadro card (for instance p400), as a solution to the 8-bit limit of the geforce? Otherwise, are there any suggestions for what the best option is for my needs?

I do not care for gaming). Many Thanks!! Hey akshat,I am planing to build pc for 4k editing and little bit for video gaming but highly for 4K editing.For 4k editing i putchased lG 4K 43inch TV model uk6780pti is that good choice? Let me know about this.For edditing i read many of comments and your answers on that commnet i am planing to go for ryzen 7 2700 series.And graphic card 1660 Ti 6GBAnd my pc build other option i selected1. Crosair 16 GB ram.2. 2 TB WD HDD3.

250GB WD SSD4. 550W PSU and other accessories.But i am confused about Motherboard, and i came on conclusion for x470 series motherboard.Now please suggest and help me toPick up perfect motherboard for my pc build.Budget for motherboard is around ₹15000,And also suggest me your best option for pc build as per mine mentioned criteria.Overall is good or not.?Let me knowWaiting for your responce.

Hi Akshat,You have given lots of useful information on graphic card.I am a graphic designer andI am doing video editing in FCP and for special effects I am using After effects and Premier.Right now I working on MAC book pro with 8 gb Ram.It take long hours for rendering and editing in After effects.So I am planning to buy GTX 1060 6 GB as suggested by you and install on my I 5 desktop (5 year old) with 8 GBRAM upgradable to 32 gb. So please advice me whether my desktop will support this card or I have to buy I 7 8750 H with intel motherboard.I will also buy external ssd hard disk.ThanksSanjay Khemka.

Hi Akishat,Thank you for all the super helpful info and tips! I’m ready for a new build and after much (probably too much) research here’s what i’m considering:Ryzen 2700xX470 MSI Gaming Plus Motherboard32G GSkill Trident 3000Mz RAMGTX 1660ti or GTX 1660240-512 Gb SSD2-3 Tb HDD800W Power SupplySome RGB lights to make it look cool 🙂I am most skeptical about the Motherboard, but I’m still trying to get the biggest performance/$ ratio. I’ve checked out the most expensive MBs and some of them have worse reviews than the less pricey ones. Also, I want to avoid bottlenecks and get the most out of the system meaning I want to be able to use all of the components together without them limiting each other – like the MB limiting the RAM speed or the processor bottlenecking the graphics card.I would mainly use it for video editing, streaming, and heavy multitasking as I do enjoy doing so many things at once 😀 I’ll play a game or two, but certainly not a priority for my purposes.Do you think these are decent specs and likely to give me the killer speed & performance/$ I’m looking for?

Any suggestions otherwise?I think I derailed a bit from just the Graphics card. Any advise you have I appreciate, thanks. Hi Akshat, I am editing my 4K videos in DaVinci Resolve and some special effects in Fusion. What are your thoughts on this system;Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 2700XMotherboard: ASRock X470 TAICHI ULTIMATE AM4 ATX (WiFi)Memory: 32GB (16GBx2) DDR4/3000MHz Dual Channel MemoryVideo Card: AMD Radeon™ VIIPSU: 850 Watts – Corsair TX-M Series TX850M 80 PLUS GOLDPrimary HD: 1TB WD Black™ SN750 Series PCIe NVMe M.2 SSDMonitor: Dell P2415Q 24″ UHD 4K MonitorIt is at the top of my budget, but is there anything you would change out? I am trying to build a system that I could upgrade easily in the future without breaking the bank.Great job as always and thanks for your advice! Good afternoon, I wanted to ask you if for the following team:mother H61M-HVGS (pci E 2.0.

16)intel I7 2nd generationmemory: 16 gb ddr3 1300 Mhzssd 480 gb600 watts real sourceIt is compatible (that is to say it would render 100%) the rx 570 8gb OC video card (256 bits memory bus), to edit video in 4k and play 1080p or I must refer to previous models with 64 or 128 bit memory bus.?In other words, there would be a bottleneck between the mother and the video card?From already thank you very much.Best regards. Hi Akshat,I’m back with new build specs. After some thought and research it seems like RX 580 8GB would be fine for my needs (not a serious gamer) and 16GB RAM should do the trick to start (can always upgrade if I’m not happy with performance and read that 32GB is not a huge performance difference over 16) Thought maybe I’ll save some $ and still get killer performance. Primary needs – content creation, 4k editing, music production, fairly heavy multitasking. I considered TR1950X, but decided to go for a more cost-effective platform that will set me up for Ryzen 3000 series if I feel it’s necessary. Here’s the new build. Do you think it will fit my needs?

Please share any advice/suggestions for changes if needed. Thanks!:Ryzen 2700XX470 MSI Gaming Plus Motherboard16GB Adata XPG Z1 3000MHz Dual ChannelRX 580 8GB512 GB SSD (Intel® 660P SERIES PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD)3 Tb HDD 7200MHzCorsair RM650 Power Supply. Hi this is shivam kushwahai am planning buy to 4K video editing1.

ASUS ROG Strix Z390-E Gaming Motherboard(WIfi) orGIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI MOTHERBOARD3. Gskill trident z rgb 3200 8×2(Suggest if better then this)4.

250gb SSD M.25. 2TB HDD WD 5400RPM6. SMPS 600 Watt7. For cooling: Air cooler A)cooler master hyper h410r or: Liquid cooler B)cooler master masterliquid 240 orC)cooler master masterliquid-ML3608.GPU 2070 or 1060 or Rx580i am so confused about Gpu. Should i go for 6gb or 8 gb?please suggest me best overclocking graphic card for 4K editing and Modeling.3 of them mentioned above or better then this by your experience.waiting to your replythanks.

Hi Akshat,Thank you for this great article! The best one I have found!My current system is a Dell 8900 with:6th Generation Intel Core i7-6700K Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.2 GHz)32GB Dual Channel DDR4 2133MHz (8GB x 4)2TB 7.2k HDD + 256GB M.2 SSDIt currently has a NV GTX 960 2G DDR5.I edit 4k videos in Premiere and AE. The computer can get quite slow when working in these programs. I do not do any gaming.Would you recommend that I upgrade to a GTX 1070 or GTX 1660 ti?Or is there other components that would be more useful to upgrade for my purposes?Thank you in advance!Brian. Akshat,Hello and thank you for all the great info. I am probably on overload but perhaps you can just clarify and offer an opinion. I will be on the road and limited to a laptop Vs PC.

My primary is video edit with 4K capabilities — I would say Pro-Sumer is the level I will be working at. I don’t need gaming. After Reading, I was pretty fixated on the gtx 1660ti and most laptops pair that with AMD Ryzen 3750h or Intel i7 9750h. What is the laptop equivalent for the AMD Ryzen 2700x? I see a couple MSI and ASUS laptops in a1200$ range but question the Ryzen 3750h specs as enough or optimal. Example here. It will also be used for small business tasks xcel,quicken, basic compute.thoughts are appreciated.The goal would be to keep it under 1400$ on sale.Many Thanks.

Hello,I found this site and it’s very helpful. I am adding a USB/HDMI capture box to my computer and would like some advice. My unit is a home theater PC used to store videos I playback via a Plex media server. I won’t be editing videos but will be doing a lot of video processing due to the nature of my setup. I plan on using the capture box to record some 30 minute shows sourced via a Roku box. I also use a program called MCE Buddy that transcodes (using H.265) over the air shows I record as well as another program that rips the videos recorded by my TV tuner. My HTPC is currently is a Ryzen 7-1700 with 16GB ram and a Gt 730 video card.

I’ve looked at Nvidia’s chart for compatibility for H.265 and my GT 730 has none. I’m wondering if it would make sense to upgrade to a newer video card that can encode H.265? If so, on the below chart the older Nvidia cards such as the 1050/1060 do not have B frame support, while the 1660 does. Is that something applicable to my situation?

Thank you.Nvidia Video Encode and Decode GPU Support Matrix- https://developer.nvidia.com/video-encode-decode-gpu-support-matrix. Akshaaaaaat help 😆So I’ve finally put all the pieces together except one.well the most important actually!The -Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX 580- GPU of all things, I found the -RX 580 ARMOR 8G OC-They both seem VERY similar in terms of price and specifications but I wasn’t sure really about how much of a difference is there between both of them, plus I’m not about to go ahead with the purchase before consulting you honestly.So what do you think about the ARMOR fitting into the build we discussed?

Or you’ve got other options within budget even If they were Nvidia GPUs although I don’t see that happening considering their price-tags 😵. Hi Akshat,I use OBS Studio to capture & record (not stream) video, I’m currently limited to H.264 due to an older GPU, I can later convert it to H265 using handbrake, but that eats up my CPU. I don’t use my PC for any high-def games. I’d like to use a budget card that will support H.265 in OBS. Assuming they will do this, I can buy a used 1050ti for under $100, a used RX580 8GB for around $115, a 1660 is still over $200 and a 1660ti is around $265. Do you think it is worth the extra money for the 1660 series cards for what I need to do?